Ironically the most self-obsessed tribe is also the tribe least inclined to self-reflection… as if “antisemitism” arose in a vacuum and has nothing to do with Judaism’s Master Race creed or Jewish behavior.
That defect alone is enough to discredit the self-vaunted “genius” claimed by the tribe. There are consequences to Jewish behaviors: Jewish supremacism, instigating gentile-against-gentile wars, fomenting revolutions, suborning heresies, undermining Christian society, false flags, big lies, inflicting multiculturalism, and perpetrating vice, ritual murder, genocide, slavery and economic crimes against humanity, including usury, fractional reserve banking, swindling, and tax farming. The perpetual pose of Jews as innocent victims is a fraud. Are there innocents among the Jews? Initially, many! But those innocents, in shielding the guilty, have made themselves accomplices of the guilty, over the millennia earning the expulsion of Jews from over a thousand nations, principalities, and city-states.
Yet despite millennia of such Jewish misanthropy, malevolence, and genocide, Israeli President Herzog claims the existence of antisemitism in the world today is “inexplicable.” Clueless or self-serving denial?
“Over representation in the economic elite of a visible ethnic minority of the degree found in Poland and Hungary was certain to cause trouble regardless of the identity of the group: if Belgians, Bulgarians, or Bolivians had constituted 62 per cent of the highest income-earners of Hungary, rather than Jews, that would certainly engendered resentment against them ... To us [Jews], European antisemitism appears to be a weapon of the strong against the weak, a kind of ideological sadism. To European right-wing nationalists of the post-1870 period, however, antisemitism appeared to be a weapon of the weak against the strong, an attempt (as they saw it) by a downtrodden nation to regain control over its resources from a separate, distinctive minority which appeared to dominate the economy -- an aim not unlike that of anti-colonial movements in the Third World vis-a-vis the Europeans and foreign entrepreneurial minorities (like the Chinese throughout South-East Asia). The Zionist movement understood this perfectly well, however disturbing such a perspective may seem to us viewed with post-Holocaust eyes.
“Moreover, research is most likely to demonstrate a very considerable actual Jewish over-representation in many other social and political areas which figured largely in the litany of continental antisemitism of the post-1870 period, especially Jewish participation in the radical left, the liberal professions, in journalism, and in the media.”
W. D. Rubinstein, Jews in the Economic Elites of Western Nations and Antisemitism, Jewish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, nos. 1 and 2, 2000, p. 18-19
Is the Gospel of John Anti-Semitic? Meditations on the Birth of the Revolutionary Jew
by E Michael Jones PhD
Culture Wars, June 2004
Former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni:
“It’s a Trick, We Always Use It.”
St. Thomas Aquinas:
“… On the contrary, It was foretold (Isaiah 8:14) that Christ would be ‘for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offense to the two houses of Israel.’
“I answer that, The salvation of the multitude is to be preferred to the peace of any individuals whatsoever. Consequently, when certain ones, by their perverseness, hinder the salvation of the multitude, the preacher and the teacher should not fear to offend those men, in order that he may insure the salvation of the multitude. Now the Scribes and Pharisees and the princes of the Jews were by their malice a considerable hindrance to the salvation of the people, both because they opposed themselves to Christ’s doctrine, which was the only way to salvation, and because their evil ways corrupted the morals of the people. For which reason our Lord, undeterred by their taking offense, publicly taught the truth which they hated, and condemned their vices. Hence we read (Matthew 15:12,14) that when the disciples of our Lord said: ‘Dost Thou know that the Pharisees, when they heard this word, were scandalized?’ He answered: ‘Let them alone: they are blind and leaders of the blind; and if the blind lead the blind, both fall into the pit.’
“… By publicly reproving the Scribes and Pharisees, Christ promoted rather than hindered the effect of His teaching. Because when the people came to know the vices of those men, they were less inclined to be prejudiced against Christ by hearing what was said of Him by the Scribes and Pharisees, who were ever withstanding His doctrine.”
The Rev. Denis Fahey, C.S.S.p., B.A., D.Ph., D.D.:
“For the Jews, ‘Anti-Semitism’ is anything that is in opposition
to the naturalistic Messianic domination of their nation over all the others.”
On the Charge of Anti-Semitism in Our Time
“…Two reasons can be assigned to the fact that Our Lord’s faithful members will often be betrayed by those who should be on the side of Christ the King. Firstly, many Catholic writers speak of Papal condemnations of Anti-Semitism without explaining the meaning of the term, and never even allude to the documents which insist on the Rights of Our Divine Lord, Head of the Mystical Body, Priest and King. Thus, very many are completely ignorant of the duty incumbent on all Catholics of standing positively for Our Lord’s Reign in society in opposition to Jewish Naturalism. The result is that numbers of Catholics are so ignorant of Catholic doctrine that they hurl the accusation of Anti-Semitism against those who are battling for the Rights of Christ the King, thus effectively aiding the enemies of Our Divine Lord. Secondly, many Catholic writers copy unquestioningly what they read in the naturalistic or anti-Supernatural Press and do not distinguish between Anti-Semitism in the correct Catholic sense, as explained above, and ‘Anti-Semitism’ as the Jews understand it. …”
Fr. Fahey’s Preface in Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked: As the Secret Power Behind Communism by Monsignor George F. Dillon, D.D. download here
by Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.S.p., pp. 7-10
“Satan aims at preventing the acknowledgment by States and Nations of the Catholic Church as the One Way established by God for ordered return to Him (after death)...The first step towards this is to get all religions, including the Jewish religion, put on the same level as the Catholic Church...This putting of all religions on the same level is usually called...the separation of Church and State.
“Satan spreads perplexity and disorder in minds by confusing the false tolerance of Liberalism, by which equal rights are granted to truth and error, with the true tolerance of the Catholic Church...it is contrary to reason that truth and error should have equal rights (without suffering the very real loss of multitudes of souls to the Adversary’s Infernal Kingdom after their deaths at the time of their Particular Judgments before Christ the King).
“Satan also spreads perplexity and disorder in minds by introducing confusion between Anti-Semitism, which is the detestable hatred of Jews as a race, and the duty incumbent upon Catholics of combating valiantly for the integral rights of Christ the King and opposing Jewish Naturalism.
“We see this clearly from the Jewish writer Bernard Lazare:
‘The Jew is the living testimony of the disappearance of the State based on theological principles (Christendom), that State which the Anti-Semites hope to restore. From the day a Jew first occupied a public office, the Christian State was in danger. That is perfectly accurate and the Anti-Semites who say that the Jews have destroyed the correct idea of the State could more justly assert that the entrance of Jews into Christian Society has symbolized the destruction of the State, I mean, of course, the Christian State.’ (L’Antisemititisme, p. 361).
“Satan wants us to forget that there is One True Religion, the Supernatural Religion established by Our Lord Jesus Christ, True God and True Man. He wants us also to lose sight of the fact that there are Organized Forces working for the Advent of the Natural Messiah.”
What Really Is Anti-Semitism?
By Fr. Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp.
Father Fahey, the great apostle of Catholic Social Doctrine, wrote this brief, but excellent expose on the question of what the Catholic Church defines as anti-Semitism. Even more so then when it was written in 1950, such a clear distinction is needed today.
On account of the confusion of mind prevalent amongst Catholics concerning the question of Anti-Semitism, a few words must be said about it.
In the excellent review of my book The Kingship of Christ and Organized Naturalism which appeared in the Jesuit magazine, La Civilta Cattolica (Rome, March 1947), the reviewer laid special stress on the distinction which I have been making in all books. He wrote as follows:
“The author wants a clear distinction to be made between hatred of the Jewish nation, which is Anti-Semitism, and opposition to the Jewish and Masonic naturalism. This opposition on the part of Catholics must be mainly positive by acknowledging, not only individually, but socially, the rights of the supernatural Kingship of Christ and His Church, and by striving politically to get these rights acknowledged by States and public life. For this indispensable undertaking… the active and effective union of Catholics… is absolutely necessary.”
Space does not allow of lengthy quotations from papal documents to show that, on the one hand, the sovereign pontiffs insist that Catholics must stand unflinchingly for the integral rights of Christ the King as contained in the papal encyclicals, while, on the other hand, keeping their minds and hearts free from hatred of Our Lord’s own nation according to the flesh. On the other hand, they must battle for the rights of Christ the King and the supernatural organization of society as laid down in the encyclical Quas Primas, unequivocally proclaiming that the rejection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the True Messias, by His own nation, and the unyielding opposition of that nation to Him, are a fundamental source of disorder and conflict in the world. On the other hand, as members of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Catholic should neither hate the members of that nation in which, through our Blessed Mother, the Lily of Israel, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity assumed human nature, nor deny them their legitimate rights as persons. The supernatural elevation of mind and heart and the unshrinking fortitude that are required from members of Christ in our day can be maintained only with the aid of Him who wept over Jerusalem’s rejection of order. It will inevitably mean suffering for Christ’s faithful members as the power of the anti-supernatural forces in the world increases. Even in the midst of their suffering, however, Christ’s members must bear in mind that there will be glorious triumph for Christ the King.
Two reasons can be assigned for the fact that Our Lord’s faithful members will often be betrayed by those who should be on the side of Christ the King.
Firstly, many Catholic writers speak of papal condemnations of Anti-Semitism without explaining the meaning of the term and never even allude to the documents which insist on the rights of Our Divine Lord, Head of the Mystical Body, Priest and King. Thus, very many are completely ignorant of the duty incumbent on all Catholics of standing positively for Our Lord’s reign in society in opposition to the Jewish naturalism. The result is that numbers of Catholics are so ignorant of Catholic doctrine that they hurl the accusation of Anti-Semitism against those who are battling for the rights of Christ the King thus effectively aiding the enemies of Our Divine Lord.
Secondly, many Catholic writers copy unquestioningly what they read in the naturalistic or anti-supernatural Press and do not distinguish between Anti-Semitism in the correct Catholic sense as explained above, and "Anti-Semitism," as the Jews understand it. For the Jews, "Anti-Semitism" is anything that is in opposition to the naturalistic Messanic domination of their nation over all the others. Quite logically, the leaders of the Jewish nation hold that to stand for the Rights of Christ the King is to be "Anti-Semitic." The term "Anti-Semitism," with all its war-connotation in the minds of the unthinking, is being extended to include any form of opposition to the Jewish nation’s naturalistic aims and any exposure of the methods they adopt to achieve these aims.
At the beatification of Joan of Arc (December 13, 1908), the saintly Pope Pius X said:
“In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of those disposed toward evil is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigor of Satan’s reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics. Oh! if I might ask the Divine Redeemer, as the Prophet Zachary did in spirit (Zach. 13:6a): ‘What are those wounds in the midst of Thy hands?’ The answer would not be doubtful: ‘… With these I was wounded in the house of them that loved me’ (Zach. 13:6b). I was wounded by my friends, who did nothing to defend me, and who, on every occasion, made themselves the accomplices of my adversaries. And this reproach can be leveled at the weak and timid Catholic of all countries.”
Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp.
Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus
June 16, 1950
“If a man alluded to the presence of a Jewish financial power in any region...he was an Anti-Semite. If he interested himself in the peculiar character of Jewish philosophical discussions, especially in matters concerning religion, he was an Anti- Semite. If the emigrations of the Jewish masses from country to country, the vast modern invasion of the United States, for instance (which has been organized and controlled like an army on the march), interested him as an historian, he could not speak of it under pain of being called an Anti-Semite. If he exposed a financial swindler who happened to be a Jew, he was an Anti-Semite. If he exposed a group of Parliamentarians taking money from the Jews, he was an Anti-Semite. If he did no more than call a Jew a Jew, he was an Anti-Semite.”
Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1922, pp. 160-161.
“Hatred in general is a vehement aversion entertained by one person for another, or for something more or less identified with that other. Theologians commonly mention two distinct species of this passion.
“One (odium abominationis, or loathing) is that in which the intense dislike is concentrated primarily on the qualities or attributes of a person, and only secondarily, and as it were derivatively, upon the person himself.
“The second sort (odium inimicitiae, or hostility) aims directly at the person, indulges a propensity to see what is evil and unlovable in him, feels a fierce satisfaction at anything tending to his discredit, and is keenly desirous that his lot may be an unmixedly hard one, either in general or in this or that specified way.
This second kind of hatred, as involving a very direct and absolute violation of the precept of charity, is always sinful and may be grievously so. The first-named species of hatred, in so far as it implies the reprobation of what is actually evil, is not a sin and may even represent a virtuous temper of soul. In other words, not only may I, but I even ought to, hate what is contrary to the moral law. Furthermore one may without sin go so far in the detestation of wrongdoing as to wish that which for its perpetrator is a very well-defined evil, yet under another aspect is a much more signal good. For instance, it would be lawful to pray for the death of a perniciously active heresiarch with a view to putting a stop to his ravages among the Christian people. Of course, it is clear that this apparent zeal must not be an excuse for catering to personal spite or party rancour. Still, even when the motive of one's aversion is not impersonal, when, namely, it arises from the damage we may have sustained at the hands of others, we are not guilty of sin unless besides feeling indignation we yield to an aversion unwarranted by the hurt we have suffered. This aversion may be grievously or venially sinful in proportion to its excess over that which the injury would justify.…”
“You that love the Lord, hate evil: the Lord preserveth the souls of his saints,
he will deliver them out of the hand of the sinner.”
“No man can serve two masters. For either he will hate the one, and love the other: or he will sustain the one, and despise the other.
You cannot serve God and Mammon.”
You cannot serve God and the Synagogue of Satan!
Who could hate such wonderful people?
“You and your f@#king Jesus can kiss my a$%....
We killed Jesus and we’re proud of it...”
by Andrew Joyce, May 18, 2020
“‘Hate facts’ are provable realities allegedly tainted with hate, and thus represent aspects of material existence deemed so awful they are denied despite their evident truth.… The entire history of the Jewish people can be read as involving a quite shameless hatred for the rest of humanity. … The war on hate is founded on a ridiculous premise — that everything in modern culture is perfectly agreeable and that there are no logical or moral grounds for strongly opposing anything or anyone in our midst.… The war on hate is founded on a ridiculous premise — that everything in modern culture is perfectly agreeable and that there are no logical or moral grounds for strongly opposing anything or anyone in our midst.… The Jewish campaign against hate is a new attempt at a revolution in values. Those European imbeciles who nibble at this bait, convinced that they are part of some moral crusade for universal brotherhood, are throwing themselves into a campaign supporting Jewish hate. Isn’t it obvious that Europeans who adopt the new values aren’t ‘against hate’ but merely sublimate their instincts and agree to hate themselves? …
“The Longest Hatred
“Jews have described anti-Semitism as the ‘longest hatred.’ I disagree. It is clear to any educated onlooker that Semitism itself, insofar as Semitism is defined as the behavioural expression of the Jewish hatred of mankind, represents the oldest hatred in recorded history. The interesting point here is that all Jewish examinations of what they perceive to be the ‘longest hatred‘ are conspicuous in their avoidance of the issue of cause and object. Hatred of the Jews is, for Jews, entirely spontaneous and self-creating. …If Semitism is, as I have argued, the true “longest hatred,’ then what is its cause and object? Causes here are both internal and external to Jews. Judaism, the precise origins of which will remain forever unknown and unknowable, commands a strict separation from other humans and the formation of an ethnic caste above all others. It asserts an ultimate, cosmic superiority, and permits the infliction of a lesser ethics upon presumed inferiors. Jewish hate has arisen from time immemorial in the simple fact that other humans (collectively lumped together simply as goyim) refuse to accept this state of affairs, and that they fail to indulge Judaism’s dominance fantasy. From the beginning of Judaism until the present day, Jews have encountered populations who refuse to see Jews as their superiors. These non-Jewish populations have consistently refused to be subjected to lesser treatment, and they have hated the Jews for attempting to impose it upon them. Jews have responded to this reactionary hatred with a further hatred of their own — a dishonest hatred that hides even from itself and postures as a morose remembering of past injustices. The cycle continues endlessly, with Jewish hatred thus internally and perpetually powered via the momentum of the past.
“The lachrymose history of the Jews is in fact the story of frustrated attempts at dominance, and although it presents as a tale of woe, it is in fact a hit-list for revenge. Adam and Gedaliah Afterman have written of the Medieval period as a time in which Jews cultivated a powerful theology/ideology of revenge for perceived wrongs perpetrated by host populations. One Medieval Ashkenazi tale, for example, portrays God as ‘listing on his garment’ the names of all Jewish victims of Gentiles over the course of time so that in the future the deity would have a record of those to be avenged. [A. Afterman & G. Afterman, ‘Meir Kahane and Contemporary Jewish Theology of Revenge,’ Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 98, No. 2, (2015), 192-217, (197).] Isn’t it clear that this tale is a mere externalizing of deeper instincts? Isn’t Jewish culture and historiography the real ‘garment‘ upon which Jews name their ‘victims,’ thereby paving the way for a future vengeance executed not by a deity but by the true object of Jewish worship — the Jews themselves?… opponents of all kinds are engaged in mass duplicity, disguising their own selfish interests as ‘love,’ their own grudges as ‘tolerance,’ and their own hatred as ‘kindness.’ Surrounded by detestable things lingering under dishonesty, we must embrace a ‘perfect hatred,’ [Psalms 138:22] and be at peace in it, in the certain knowledge that, while the weak fall by the way side, we will carry it to its completion.”
ADL 2019 Global Survey: Goyim Hate Jews Even More
by David Israel - 23 Heshvan 5780 – November 21, 2019
The Anti-Semitic Origins of “Hip Hip Hooray”
by Marc Davis, Jewniverse, Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), January 21, 2014
Is there anything that isn’t antisemitic?
Prophecy of the stigmatist & victim soul Blessed Anna Katharina Emmerick, 9/27/1820
“I saw deplorable things: they were gambling, drinking, and talking in the Church; they were also courting women. All sorts of abominations were perpetrated there. Priests allowed everything and said Mass with much irreverence. I saw that few of them were godly, and only a few had sound views on things. I also saw Jews standing under the porch of the Church. All these things caused me much distress.”
by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D., September 27, 2019
“If you’re a Jew, you know it the nanosecond you hear it. Anti-Semitism. The real deal. You can’t help it. You carry the sensors for Jew-hate around with you – the alarm receptors are built into your every cell, coiled into your mitochondria, twist-tied into your DNA. Trip-wires to alert you to the Nazi-worshipper, the Grand Inquisitor, the Klansman, the Christ-avenger.”
Trump Has Made It Official: He Is the Greatest anti-Semite of Our Age
The antisemitic conspiracy behind the anti-porn movement
by Mira Fox, Forward magazine, September 23, 2021
by Gilad Atzmon, February 11, 2018
Gentiles hate Jews “for no reason”
…“because it’s in their DNA”
…“no different from gravity”
…“it’s natural law”
…“people are born with antisemitic feelings”
Esau HATES Jacob for NO reason
Jews are steeped in this psychopathology their entire lives
disappeared from (((YouTube))) • https://youtu.be/6FKsJFGVja8
No, antisemitism is from jealousy present in gentile DNA.
Rabbi: Where Does Anti-Semitism Come From? JEALOUSY
…and antisemitism was created by God Himself???!!!
“…anti-Semitism which is part of creation, according to Rabbi Shimon Bar-Yochai, who stars in much of the Zohar book of Kabbalah.”
Rabbi Zalman Melamed, dean of the Bet El Yeshiva
Jews Struggle with our Sages’ Teaching that Gentiles Hate Us
by David Israel, the Jewish Press, April 28, 2019
Rabbi Claims that ‘Antisemitism’ Is an Unchangeable ‘Law of Nature’ Created by God
God created antisemitism??? Go figure.
Oh, and… “jealousy.”
not from Jewish supremacism,
not from terrorism and genocide,
not from warmongering,
not from weaponzing money,
not from tax-farming,
not from promoting perversion,
not from promoting abortion,
not from child sex slavery,
not from misogyny and rape,
not from subverting nations,
not from slavery.
Does “no reason” include the 61.9 million Christians murdered by Jewish Communism in their Soviet paradise? Or the 75 million murdered in the K'aifeng and Ashkenazi Jewish paradise of Communist China?
Putin’s rabbi, Chabadnik Rabbi Berel Lazar loves to lie about Communism, so the Jews need to keep the “antisemitic persecution” lie alive. Chabad Rabbis have been in key positions for creating the image of “persecuted’ Soviet Jews as well because they control the Russian government.
For example, 1965:
“The rally will be the occasion for the dedication of ‘a living monument to the 3,000,000 suffering Jews of the Soviet Union,’Rabbi Arthur Schneier, spiritual leader of the congregation, announced.”
Fifty Leading Americans Appeal to Moscow on Soviet Treatment of Jews
Daily Briefing, Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), January 15, 1965
Complete list with graphics of the Expulsions of Jews
Jews expelled from over 1,000 places in history:
“One of the most secret forms of the gigantic, and perhaps the oldest, is the tenacious skillfulness in calculating, hustling, and intermingling through which the worldlessness of Jewry is grounded” GA 95: 97 (Überlegungen VIII, 5).
“To appropriate ‘culture’ as a means of power and thus to assert oneself and affect a superiority is at bottom Jєωιѕн behavior. What follows from this for cultural politics as such?” GA 95: 326 (Überlegungen X, 48)
“What is happening now is the end of the history of the great inception of Occidental humanity, in which inception humanity was called to the guardianship of being, only to transform this calling right away into the pretension to re-present beings in their machinational unessence…
In the history-less, that which belongs together only within it also comes most readily into the unity of complete mixture; apparent construction and renovation, and complete destruction—both are the same—the groundless—what has succumbed to mere beings and is alienated from being. As soon as the historyless has ‘set in,’ ‘historicism’ begins to run rampant; the groundless, in the most diverse and contradictory forms, falls—without recognizing itself as having the same unessence—into the most extreme enmity and craving for destruction…
And maybe in this ‘struggle’— which struggles over goallessness itself and which hence can be only the caricature of “struggle”—the greater groundlessness will ‘triumph,’ which is bound to nothing and makes everything serviceable to itself (Jewry). But the authentic triumph, the triumph of history over the historyless, is won only where the groundless excludes itself because it does not venture being, but instead always merely calculates with beings, and posits its calculations as what is real.” GA 95: 96-97 (Überlegungen VIII, 4)
“The question of the role of world Jewry is not a racial question, but the metaphysical question about the kind of humanity that, without any restraints, can take over the uprooting of all beings from being as its world-historical ‘task.'” GA 96: 243 (Überlegungen XIV) (1941)
7 New Translated Excerpts on Heidegger’s Anti-Semitism
by Zachary Siegel
The philosophy world has been abuzz with talks of Martin Heidegger’s “Black Notebooks,” a collection of Heidegger’s personal writing that has remained sealed until their publication in Germany in 2014. Since their release in German, the Notebooks have fueled heated debates about Heidegger’s ties to the Nazi Party, and even led the chairman of the Martin Heidegger Society to relinquish his position. In question are passages that reek of Nazi-era anti-Semitism that arguably inform the philosopher’s entire intellectual project.
The Considerations (Überlegungen), also known collectively as the “Black Notebooks,” have philosophers pondering if one’s work can truly be separated from its creator. Some say Heidegger’s philosophical pursuits are directly linked with his anti-Semitism while others argue that there is nothing directly correlating his immense contribution to modern thinking with his political ties to the National Socialist Party.…
Ah, the layers of irony… criticism of “antisemitism” …on a website dedicated to Critical Theory …and the (((philosopher)))'s veiled version of ad hominem: “if one’s work can truly be separated from its creator”! Certainly the sky is not blue if an “antisemite” makes the observation.
Herzl - Anti-Semite?
Jewish History professor addresses Zionist visionary and accusations that Theodor Herzl made anti-Semitic statements.
by Shimon Cohen, Arutz Sheva, Israel National News, June 9, 2017
Elsewhere, Herzl seems to claim that the Jews rule the world, provoke nations, and that it is on their orders that governments make peace. Some statements seem as if they were ripped from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,' the notorious anti-Semitic forgery which claims to reveal a Jewish conspiracy to control the world. In other statements Herzl seems to praise honest anti-Semites and favor mass conversion of Jews to Christianity.
In order to properly understand those statements, Dr. Manor said that it is important to understand the context in which they were said or written. “It is necessary to understand who is meant by what can be defined as auto-anti-Semitism. The question of the context is the true complexity of a historian's work. People say a lot of things which have to be left in context.”
“Context.” Get used to it. Understand what Jews mean by "context”:
When there are no Nazis and when there is no “antisemitism,” make some up. Nazis are useful to the Jews
ADL Defends Ukraine’s Neo-Nazis: ‘They Don’t Attack Jews Or Jewish Institutions’
Why is Putin Calling the Ukrainian Government a Bunch of Nazis?
Yes, the rabbis were—and still are—most happy that Nazi persecution served their purposes, the advancement of Zionism and consolidation of rabbinic power and prestige. All forms of genuine antisemitism (not to be confused with the ADL/Abe Foxman variety of “anything-we-don’t-like-is-antisemitism”) have served the purposes of the rabbis. Where antisemitism has not existed, Jews have had to fabricate, fund, and foster it. Much, but not all, synagogue and grave vandalism has been perpetrated by Jews themselves.
June 7, 2020, Israeli Man Charged With Arson Attacks on Jewish Religious Institutions
Why Did Jews Lie that a Jewish Cemetery in Poland Was Desecrated by Antisemites?
by Christians For Truth, February 21, 2019
April 24, 2019, Police charge River Heights cafe owners, say hate crime was staged
by Ryan Thorpe
Winnepeg Police Chief Danny Smyth announced that the three Jewish owners of BerMax Caffé + Bistro had been charged with staging the recent anti-Semitic “hate crime” at the restaurant.
March 23, 2017, Jewish Bomb Threat Suspect Undermines Groups’ Narrative on Anti-Semitism
by Ben Sales
“Many Jewish groups blamed white supremacists, emboldened by Donald Trump's campaign, for the bomb threats that have plagued Jewish institutions since the beginning of this year. It appears the groups were wrong. The news that one Jewish teen - an Israeli, no less - was behind most of the approximately 150 bomb threats that have hit Jewish community centers since the start of 2017 is a shocking twist in light of months in which the Anti-Defamation League and other groups pointed their collective finger at the far right ... Jonathan Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University, noted that this isn't the first time that Jews have committed anti-Semitic acts ... ‘It is a reminder that we have to be very careful before we talk about a whole wave of anti-Semitism,’ Sarna said. ”
Among many such others:
The lesson is clear. Genuine antisemitism serves the rabbis’ purposes. Catholics are called to emulate Jesus, not Hitler or the Canadian Jewish Congress or the Jews who collaborated with Hitler for the destruction of their own people.
Yet another swastika-scrawling Jew
navigate this page